Free Novel Read

Into the Cosmos Page 22


  mise had been painless. They announced that developing a way to return

  space capsules to Earth safely was now a top priority and indicated that

  many more dogs would fly in space before the first human was sent.36

  Laika’s satellite, which American reporters had dubbed a “rocket-shaped

  dog house,” remained aloft until April 15, 1958, when its decaying orbit

  caused it to reenter Earth’s atmosphere and incinerate. Although other

  dogs would perish in the quest to make space travel a reality for humans,

  Laika was the only one deliberately sent to her death.

  Over the next two years dogs remained central to Soviet efforts to

  master space, with work proceeding along two fronts. Scientists resumed

  vertical launches into the upper atmosphere using dogs to gather data

  about the effects of weightlessness, radiation, g-forces, and extreme tem-

  peratures on living organisms. Engineers continued to design larger ve-

  hicles for orbital deployment and develop insulation and braking mecha-

  nisms that would make the safe return of these crafts possible. In August

  1958, Belianka (Whitey) and Pestraia (Spotty) survived a suborbital flight

  that carried them nearly three hundred miles above the Earth. Like Laika,

  the dogs underwent extensive training to accustom them to the cramped

  conditions of the space capsule, the noise of its instruments, and the vi-

  bration and pressure they would experience in the initial phases of the

  flight. Although their flight was widely acclaimed, their fame paled in

  comparison to that of Otvazhnaia (Courageous), who weathered five sub-

  orbital flights to “great heights” between June 1959 and July 1960, earn-

  ing her the moniker “world’s most travelled space dog.”37 In the London

  Times a picture of Otvazhnaia and the rabbit (Marfusha) that had been

  her crewmate ran directly adjacent to a photograph of (Malcolm) Scott

  Carpenter, one of the seven men in training for flight on an American

  satellite.38 The Soviets pointed to Otvazhnaia’s continued good health and

  Marfusha’s litter of healthy kits as evidence that humans could also be

  protected from the potential environmental dangers of space.39 “Space

  Is Getting Closer,” proclaimed a Soviet headline after the dog’s third

  flight.40

  Meanwhile, a spacecraft had been developed with a system of retro-

  rockets that would serve as a braking mechanism and allow it to re-

  enter Earth’s atmosphere. The first “spaceship” ( korabl-sputnik) that was

  142  Amy Nelson

  launched in May 1960 carried a “dummy astronaut” but no dogs. It failed

  to respond to ground control and was never recovered. In July a test of

  the second Vostok spacecraft ended in disaster when a booster rocket exploded during the launch, killing the two dogs on board.41

  Success came on August 19, when a ten-thousand-pound spacecraft

  carried Belka (Squirrel) and Strelka (Little Arrow) on seventeen orbits and

  returned them safely to Earth after twenty-four hours in space. Although

  an assortment of rats, mice, fruit flies, and plants accompanied the two

  dogs, acclaim for becoming the first living beings to return safely from

  orbital flight focused almost exclusively on Belka and Strelka. The dogs

  made front-page headlines in the United States and the Soviet Union for

  days and were the subjects of a press conference at the TASS building

  in central Moscow on August 22. Dressed in civilian clothes, Gazenko

  and Liudmila Radkevich presented the dogs, still clad in their flight cos-

  tumes, to an adoring public and the Soviet media. TASS broadcast the

  affair on the radio, and that evening Soviet citizens watched the celestial

  travelers on television.42 American and French correspondents delivered

  photographs of the dogs to media outlets in the West, where information

  about the dogs and the details of their training, behavior, and response

  to the flight were eagerly sought after. The dogs’ “normal” behavior in

  public, television images showing their calm reaction to weightlessness,

  and the Soviets’ assurances that postflight physiological tests (including

  electrocardiograms) revealed no abnormalities suggested that spaceflight

  was safe for canines and might soon be a reality for humans as well.43

  The articulation of this expectation in Soviet headlines, such as “A new

  step on the path toward human space flight” and “Astronaut, get ready to

  travel!” was underscored when a photograph of the dogs appeared on the

  cover of Ogonek over the caption “Space, expect a visit from Soviet man!”

  (figure 6.1).44

  Following the triumph of Belka and Strelka’s safe return, several ad-

  ditional missions were scheduled to perfect the ground control and brak-

  ing mechanisms and to reconfirm that humans could expect to survive

  the conditions of rocket launch and weightlessness without any ill effects.

  The first of these launches suggested that the new systems were far from

  foolproof. On December 1, 1960, a five-ton spacecraft carrying two dogs

  went out off course during reentry, activating a self-destruct mechanism

  that kept the capsule from landing in foreign territory.45 A second launch

  later that month began auspiciously, but the third-stage rockets misfired,

  Cold War Celebrity and the Courageous Canine Scout  143

  Figure 6.1. Fans greet Belka and Strelka before their press conference, August 1960.

  Source: Pravda, August 23, 1960.

  triggering an emergency-landing mechanism. After a four-day search

  the craft’s canine passengers were recovered cold, but alive, in a remote

  region of Siberia near the Tungus meteorite crater.46

  Space dogs next appeared in the news in January 1961, when the birth

  of Strelka’s six healthy puppies provided further proof that space travel

  posed no reproductive health risks. Two successful orbital flights with

  dogs and dummy astronauts in March raised expectations that a flight

  with a human passenger was imminent. When Chernushka (Blackie)

  was successfully recovered from her spaceship on March 9, a cartoon in

  Krasnaia zvezda depicted a space dog walking out of its ship and handing off a suitcase of “data on the results of spaceflight” to a space suit–clad

  human.47 Zvezdochka’s (Little star) safe return on March 25 after eighty-

  eight minutes in orbit was hailed as the “latest great victory of Soviet

  science.” A few days later, the Academy of Sciences hosted another press

  conference to show off the two newest space travelers as well as Strelka’s

  furry, barking brood (figure 6.2).48

  As the focus of the Soviet space program shifted to manned flight,

  some hallmarks of the space dog program remained, even as the dogs

  receded from the limelight. Like the space dogs, Yuri Gagarin’s name

  was announced only when his historic voyage on April 12 was under way.

  Also like the space dogs, and despite his extensive training as a pilot and

  144  Amy Nelson

  Figure 6.2. Strelka’s puppies check out “space mice” at a press conference, March 28, 1961.

  Source: RGANTD, 1-19651.

  astronaut, Gagarin was a passenger rather than the pilot of his spacecraft,

  which was controlled from the
ground. Flying in the same craft used by

  Chernushka and Zvezdochka, Gagarin acknowledged the role the dogs

  had played in bringing about his triumph. Others concurred that “man’s

  path to space had been laid by his faithful friend, the dog.”49

  But inevitably, once human spaceflight had been accomplished, the

  centrality of nonhumans to that endeavor began to be minimized in the

  master narratives of the space race. A significant step in this process was

  taken as early as June 1961, when officials from the Soviet embassy pre-

  sented Pushinka, one of Strelka’s puppies, to the Kennedy family along

  with a model of a nineteenth-century whaling ship carved from wal-

  rus tusks.50 Her mother might have been a “fearless space scout,” but

  Pushinka—“a fluffy white puppy of distinguished parentage but undis-

  tinguished breed”—was merely a memento of the Soviets’ temporary su-

  periority in the race for the stars. Pushinka later had puppies sired by

  Caroline Kennedy’s Welsh Terrier, Charlie.

  Cold War Celebrity and the Courageous Canine Scout  145

  Although the Soviets continued to send animals into space through

  the 1980s, Gagarin’s flight marked the end of an era, as the fame and

  bravery of human cosmonauts quickly overshadowed the celebrity of

  the space dogs. In 1966 canine cosmonauts claimed a final milestone

  when Veterok (Little wind) and Ugolek (Little coal) spent twenty-two days

  aboard Kosmos 110, setting a record for canine spaceflight—one that was broken by humans in Skylab only in 1974.51 Unlike their predecessors,

  however, these dogs were identified more as experimental animals than

  as canine celebrities. Indeed, the research on Veterok’s and Ugolok’s re-

  sponse to long-term spaceflight supplemented a much larger study of

  the effects of prolonged radiation conducted on 330 anonymous dogs at

  the Institute of Bio-Medical Problems beginning in 1965.52 The renown

  enjoyed by Pushinka and her puppies as presidential pets exploited the

  space dog legacy, even as it tokenized the contribution of the individual

  dogs who helped make space travel a reality for humans.

  Constructing the Canine Hero

  In a pithy assessment of the synergy between technological advances

  and the global distribution of the sounds and images that made them

  “real” to ordinary citizens in the postwar period, Svetlana Boym has as-

  serted that for Soviet citizens “the ‘Space Age’ began not with Gagarin’s

  flight but with the moment the flight was reported. From then on, the

  age was associated with the triumph of communism on Earth.”53 No less

  than Gagarin, the space dogs’ fame was inextricably linked to the nearly

  immediate mass distribution and endless recirculation of their images

  on film and in photographs as well as their satellites’ distinctive “bleeps,”

  which were monitored by amateur radio operators around the globe.54

  That fame drew on a number of interlinked discourses, including

  changing human attitudes toward dogs, the traditions of Russian-Soviet

  science, and superpower rivalries. Most obviously, the canine cosmo-

  nauts served as ideal foils for a regime intent on protecting scientific

  secrets and trumpeting its accomplishments.55 The dogs’ names, photo-

  graphs, and some details about their training and temperament could be

  broadcast safely, without compromising the security of the human forces

  behind the missions’ success. Focusing attention on the dogs also made

  it less obvious that little other meaningful information about the space

  program was available. Immediately after the launch of Sputnik 1, the

  146  Amy Nelson

  Figure 6.3. “Orchestrating Celebrity”: Otvazhnaia and a rabbit pose for cameramen.

  Source: RGANTD, 1-19550.

  identities of the people most responsible for its success were classified

  as top secret. For many years Korolev, Tikhonravov, Valentin Glushko,

  and Mstislav Keldysh were never identified by name and were referred to

  in the press only by such anonymous titles as “chief designer of rocket-

  space systems” or “chief theoretician of cosmonautics.” Public speaking

  about the program was delegated to politically reliable spokespeople with

  little direct involvement in its operations. The veil of secrecy extended to

  specific information about the design, function, and physical location of

  spacecraft as well as the broader objectives of the space program.

  Of course, information about the dogs also was carefully controlled.

  Their anthropomorphic celebrity was crafted to facilitate a connection be-

  tween the dogs and ordinary people who were interested in space explora-

  tion or might have a pet dog at home. In most cases the first photographs

  of the dogs were published when their mission was announced, usually on

  launch day. Invariably, these were close-up “headshots,” clearly modeled

  on the formal portraits of humans that often accompanied news stories.

  Sometimes these images were fairly nondescript and served primarily to

  link “a name with a face” and provide “proof” that the individual existed.

  In the case of Laika the angle of the image and the pose of the dog in the

  photo published on November 5, 1957, were carefully calculated to convey

  Cold War Celebrity and the Courageous Canine Scout  147

  a sense of the dog’s confidence and alertness. In contrast, postflight pho-

  tographs showed relaxed, happy, and often panting pooches. Photos of

  Otvazhnaia lounging underneath Marfusha, the rabbit, and next to her

  canine comrade, Malek, betrayed no sign of the animals’ involvement

  in rocket launches. They could have been members of a circus act or an

  unusual trio of pets. When the dogs were displayed for journalists, their

  handlers described their behavior and relationships in anthropomorphic

  terms, insisting that Otvazhnaia’s name (Courageous) reflected her brav-

  ery and enthusiasm for flying in rockets. They also poked fun at Malek’s

  “cowardice,” noting that he had whimpered as the crane lifted his capsule

  onto the top of the ballistic missile that would send him to the outer

  reaches of the atmosphere (figures 6.3 and 6.4).56

  Anthropomorphism was just one strand of a media campaign that

  tapped the multivalence of dogs in Soviet society, framing the canine

  cosmonauts simultaneously as brave scouts and ordinary heroes while

  deploying visual associations with technology and spaceflight to maxi-

  mum effect. On the one hand, the space dogs’ handlers portrayed their

  charges as “normal dogs,” emphasizing their interest in treats, petting,

  and other “normal dog” behavior. They were described as “quick-witted,

  obedient, and healthy,” suggesting the desired traits any dog lover would

  seek in a pet. After Strelka’s puppies were born, photos of the canine

  “family” emphasized Strelka’s attentive maternal instincts, the puppies’

  physical vitality, playfulness, and that inescapable “cute factor.”57 On the

  other hand, “the most famous dogs on earth,” wore flight suits to their

  press conferences and were photographed standing atop scientific equip-

  ment. Cartoons of the dogs suggested
that spaceflight was challenging

  but fun. When journalists viewed television images of the dogs lying in-

  ert and helpless in the first moments of weightlessness during the flight,

  they were told that the dogs were “resting” before settling down to their

  “breakfast.”58

  In addition, the dogs’ triumphs competed and were intertwined with

  other Cold War milestones. In the Soviet Union news of Laika’s voyage

  in Sputnik 2 vied for top billing with photos of Mao Zedong greeting

  Khrushchev and other dignitaries assembling to commemorate the for-

  tieth anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. In both the Soviet Union

  and the United States, news of Belka and Strelka’s successful return ran

  on equal footing with coverage of the sentencing of the American U2 pi-

  lot Francis Gary Powers to ten years in Soviet prison. President Kennedy’s

  148  Amy Nelson

  Figure 6.4. Zvezdochka, the last space dog before Gagarin, March 1961. Source: RGANTD, 1-19639.

  inauguration received scant notice in Soviet newspapers, which elected

  to run photos and news of the birth of Strelka’s puppies instead. Clearly,

  political agendas in Moscow and Washington drove a considerable part of

  the dogs’ fame.

  Cold War Celebrity and the Courageous Canine Scout  149

  Besides being the focus of a carefully crafted media campaign, the

  space dogs tapped into a broader tradition of canine renown in the Soviet

  Union. The mass circulation press and popular science publications in-

  variably portrayed them as courageous “scouts of the cosmos,” validating

  a model of canine heroism that mirrored popular constructions of canine

  virtue and informed a resurgence of pet keeping in the Soviet Union after

  World War II.59 Although the Bolsheviks had stigmatized keeping pets for

  pleasure and companionship as decadent and bourgeois, the family dog

  made a cautious comeback in the postwar period.60 Among the many fac-

  tors influencing this newer trend was an ethos of utility, which stressed

  the practical value of dogs as “workers” who helped humans hunt wild

  animals, herd livestock, and protect socialist property. Socialist ideology

  also valued dogs’ contributions to the military during the war and their

  long-standing importance to scientific research.